Rasputin's Importance To History, Part 5
It was during World War I that Rasputin did the most damage to the Tsar and Tsarina, although certainly not without their participation. It has to be noted here that Nicholas tended to give in to his wife's wishes on many, if not most, occasions. There seems to be no question that many involved with the imperial couple said that Alexandra was indeed the strong and decisive partner and Nicholas the weaker and indecisive. I'll go out on a limb here and say that it has been my experience that when you have a person with a weak and vacillating personality, when they finally make a decision on something, even if that decision turns out to be wrong, that they then have a hell of a time changing their minds, and they tend to cling too stubbornly to their incorrect decision. In my opinion Nicholas was certainly in this category. On the other hand, Alexandra was strong and convinced that God would bless any decision made by the Tsar and supported, if not urged upon him, by her, and also supported, if not urged upon her, by Rasputin. To be quite honest, it is sometimes difficult to sort out whether Rasputin always, or even frequently, proposed policies to the Tsarina, and that then she in turn urged the policies upon Nicholas, or whether Alexandra had general ideas about certain policies, expressed them to Rasputin, and that Rasputin, ever the wily one, then gave his blessing to the policies and perhaps even filled in some detail, never wanting to actually contradict the Tsarina, as he well knew that his position depended upon her. It was likely something of a mixture. It bears repeating here, Alexandra believed that Rasputin had a special relationship with God and even talked with God, and that it was only through Rasputin that her son remained alive. As such, she certainly discussed matters of government with Rasputin, and even military matters. If I remember correctly, Nicholas was upset to learn that at one point, Alexandra had told Rasputin about a coming Russian military offensive in order that he would bless the attack and thus guarantee success. As I mentioned in a previous segment, she exhibited poor judgment when it came to Rasputin.
WORD HISTORY:
Dacha-This word, meaning "a small home (often vacation home) in the country," goes back to Indo European "doh," which had the notion "give, present, offer." This gave its Old Slavic offspring "datya," meaning "give," which was passed to Russian as "dat" (give), which then produced the noun "dacha," originally a small home "given" by a noble to someone for their valued service. English borrowed the word from Russian in the latter part of the 1800s. It is related to "datum" (more commonly used in its plural, "data," meaning "something given," usually now, "information given") and "donation" ("something freely given for a cause"), two words of Latin derivation borrowed by English.
Labels: Empress Alexandra, English, etymology, Nicholas II, Rasputin, Russia, Russian, Russian history, Slavic languages, Tsarism
2 Comments:
My great-great uncle Aron was secretary to Rasputing for 10 years, and, in his memoirs, tells of some of the policy changes Rasputin urged upon the tzar - most of these changes had to do with equal rights for Jews (which Aron was) and Russian peasants. At the time, Jews were restricted from living in cerain areas, holding certain jobs, and there were quotas on how many could go to university and get an education.Rasputin was against war and killing and often advised the tzar to "pay off" a country rather than go to war. Nicholas II and his uncles were die-hard anti-semites who slaughtered whole towns of Jews in pogroms. Rasputin tried to get laws passed and put people in office who advocated equal rights for all. And he never killed anyone. And he was maligned for his efforts for equal rights.
You make some good points. Rasputin certainly tried to keep the Tsar from going to war in 1914, but he was at home in Siberia recovering from an assassination attempt (a woman stabbed him in the abdomen). There has been speculation by historians, that if Rasputin had been in the capitol at that time, that he may well have succeeded in keeping the Tsar from mobilizing the Russian army, an act which then prompted Germany and Austria-Hungary to mobilize. As it was, he was confined to sending telegrams.
Further, you are absolutely right about the monarchy's anti-Jewish policies, policies which actually brought many Russian Jews to America during that era, so that they could escape the terrible pogroms and other persecution. What later happened under the Nazis seems to me to have been far more possible in Russia, where Jews were not much assimilated into the population and where violence against Jews was far more common, than in Germany, where Jews were far more assimilated, so much more assimilated that many Jews seemed not to believe that their very existence was in danger. That's part of what bewilders so many people about the Nazi horrors.
I also agree, that as far as we know, Rasputin never killed anyone directly, but in a broader sense, how many people may (or may not) have died as a result of certain policies advocated or supported by Rasputin could well be another matter. It depends upon each person's point of view on this very controversial figure. Bush and Rumsfeld detractors would "probably" readily admit that neither man has directly killed anyone, but indirectly...
Post a Comment
<< Home