Some Additions To We All Love A Mystery
This was first published in 2007, but I've since
revised it ever so slightly and I've added a "Word History." The photo below was added 1-28-22.
Anna Anderson had a fair number of supporters during her lifetime. If I
remember correctly, however, opinion polls over the years showed that the
overwhelming percentage of the public did NOT believe she was the Tsar's
daughter, and this was well before any Romanov remains were unearthed or any
DNA testing was conducted. As I noted in the main story, she had some very
wealthy supporters who were her outright benefactors, providing housing, clothing
and financial assistance, and at times, a pretty high lifestyle.
By the early to mid 1990s, when DNA testing had shown that Anderson was not
the Tsar's daughter, the remaining supporters were just devastated. There was
disbelief in the test results, as well as suspicions that testing samples had
been planted in some way by Anderson's Romanov opponents. That's
understandable. Some people had been very committed to Anna Anderson's cause,
and to have that cause totally disintegrate brought about a common human
reaction, denial. I don't doubt for one minute the sincerity of the affection
that many of her supporters had for her, but at times, our emotional attachment
to a cause can smack our own self esteem, when that cause comes crashing down.
Certainly I'd have to believe that was the case with many of Anderson's
supporters. While they protested the test results, they had to feel that they
had been deceived by Anderson and that kind of thing leads to people questioning
their own judgment. When Richard Nixon was re-elected as president in 1972, he
received tens of millions of votes. Just about a year and a half later, with
the Watergate scandal on the front page of every newspaper, it was tough to
find anyone who admitted to voting for him.
Now, was Anna Anderson just a flat out fraud?
The bottom line answer would have to be that she was. When she dropped the
grenade in the munitions factory, and the one worker was killed, and she
herself was badly wounded, she was given much psychiatric treatment, but when
she was released from the hospital, the doctors declared that she was not
"cured" of her emotional troubles. As I mentioned in the main
article, thereafter, she was treated at various other times in her life for mental
instability. So, what am I getting at?
I had an acquaintance who passed away a couple
of years ago. I won't go into the details, but he "claimed" to be
fairly well off financially, to have property in Beverly Hills, and to have
worked at a particular job for many years. For those of us who were around him,
we could neither prove nor disprove his story, or stories, if you will. When we
make friends, we like to know something about those friends, and we like to
feel some sort of trust with our friends. In this case, most of us did not
believe the guy's story (most of us still liked him very much, although a few
felt deceived and they were angry). The reasons are not really important, but
my feelings were always that he started out telling a bit of an exaggeration
about himself, and that the story eventually just got out of hand, and I guess
you could say, that it took on a life of it's own. He had gone so far with the
story, that he would have been humiliated to have to recant. I've always felt
sorry for him, in that he wanted so much to be something that he wasn't. Now,
all of us have exaggerated (or downplayed) something about ourselves, and if
exaggerating were a crime, I suppose all of YOU.....okay, all of US would
be doing time. Just like Anna Anderson's story, this guy's story just did not
always make sense, nor did it fit with his life. So, did Anderson's story just
get out of hand, or did she just plain take advantage of gullible folks who
wanted to believe that at least one Romanov princess had escaped the Bolsheviks?
Remember, as time passed, she didn't have to work, and she lived a very
extravagant lifestyle for a time, with wealthy benefactors footing the bill.
With that in mind, I want all of you to know that I'm really Ross Perot's long
lost son.
^ The Semitic languages are a group of related languages
"centered" in the Middle East and eastern Africa, but also spoken
beyond those areas. The most common modern Semitic languages are Arabic,
Amharic, Hebrew and Tigrinya, but in ancient times Semitic included Assyrian and
Phoenician, with Phoenician being spoken in ancient times in the Middle East and in North Africa by the
Carthaginians.
Labels: Anastasia, Anna Anderson, English, etymology, Franziska Schanzkowska, Greek, Latin, Romanovs, Semitic languages
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home