Browns' Showtime: Hype & Reality

While I like sports in general, since the time I was a little kid I loved baseball and the Cleveland Indians. I loved the Indians so much, I got too close and too wrapped up in what is supposed to be entertainment and fun. Our teams become a part of us, but as long as you can see a line between your life and your favorite sports teams, you'll likely keep some healthy perspective; after all, sports teams aren't doing research on deadly or crippling diseases, they play goddamn games. For quite a number of years I took it all far too seriously, and I was too sensitive to criticism of the Indians especially. For many years there was a Cleveland sportswriter named Bob Dolgan who regularly wrote many an article critical of Cleveland sports teams. He was tough and often I would bristle at the things he wrote. He challenged my hopes and dreams for these teams, no matter how unrealistic, and I didn't like it. Time and the explosion of BIG money in professional sports brought me to view sports with a far better perspective. I also saw that getting my feathers ruffled about criticism of my teams or favorite players was not something that should anger or devastate me. Criticism is given by people who care and want to see improvements in things. When sportswriters, commentators and fans stop criticizing a team, that team is in deep trouble, because apathy is the real enemy of any entity. I came to VERY MUCH appreciate Bob Dolgan and his sometimes scathing articles. In more recent times I feel the sports media has climbed into bed with the sports teams they are covering, and far too often they seem to be employed by the public relations departments of the teams, lacking only pom poms to complete the role of cheerleaders, although I've often wondered if we could open their bedroom closets that the pom poms would fall out. Fans have a responsibility in all of this too, because I have a sneaking suspicion that if someone wrote a "Dolganesque" article in these times, there would be a big part of the public that would tear them apart, perhaps even literally, and then retreat to their own little corner of the Internet to join with like minded people to reinforce their own beliefs. Most media companies would likely not dare hire or keep such a person nowadays.

For a couple of decades now, I've rarely watched or listened to complete games in any sport, because all I do is complain, so I check the score and perhaps watch for a short time. I've also learned to pick on and make fun of Cleveland teams myself. It's something they generally deserve, and if you live and die with a team or teams, where ever you live in the world, you'll find that poking fun at YOUR team will not end civilization, and that it all helps you to feel a little better about any particular loss, as it helps to kill the pain. I'm not saying you won't still be mad about things somewhat, but if joking can limit that anger, it's a good thing. Anyway...  

For months the Cleveland sports media, with support from the national media, built the hyped up narrative of the Cleveland Browns and a potential championship. Many fans fell for it, but that's understandable; those hopes and dreams we have for our teams, and for us and for our egos that we have attached to those teams. For others more financially tied to the fortunes of the Browns, they loved all the hype. Understand, things may yet work out, but the narrative got far out of hand before even one game was played, and many players made their contribution to the escalating and already overblown expectations. So these "spinners" lived a good life for months, because they could offer all sorts of support for a big season, but they didn't have to offer any results... at that time. Like true spinners who weave cloth into clothing, like underwear, eventually they have to put on those underwear, and if the underwear unravel, the spinner is "exposed." On Sunday, September 8, 2019, the Cleveland Browns put on their "spun" underwear, and the underwear unraveled. You have to make hype INTO reality. 

WORD HISTORY:
Hyperbole-The first part of this compound is distantly related to "over," a word from the Germanic roots of English, with the second part related to "ball" (the noun meaning, "a dance"), a word English borrowed from French, and which traces back to Latin and then to Greek. The part "hyper" goes back to the Indo European root "upo," with the notion of "from under" or "from below," "to go over/above," and its extended form "uper," meaning, "over, above." This gave transliterated Ancient Greek "hyper," also meaning, "over, above;" thus also, "beyond." The "bole" part goes back to Indo European "gwele/gwela," with the notion of, "bubble up, rise up, overflow, throw outward or upward." The Indo European form gave transliterated Greek "ballein," meaning, "to throw," which provided the form "bol," meaning, "the act of throwing." The resulting Greek compound was "hyperbole," which meant, "throwing beyond, throwing out beyond;" thus the figurative, "a throwing of ideas out beyond truth or reality," thus, "exaggeration." Latin borrowed the word from Greek and English borrowed it from Latin in the first half of the 1400s. Latin also used the altered form "hyperbola" as a geometrical word having to do with planes, cones and angles. English borrowed this form in the middle of the 1600s.    

"Draft Day"

Let's see ... "Draft Day," I'll have a brown ale. Oh, not that kind of draft day. Actually this movie, like "Captain America: The Winter Soldier," had many scenes filmed here in Cleveland and the Cleveland Browns are central to the story. It opens April 11, although there was a special preview Tuesday evening, April 8 in Cleveland, and likely some other locations. It was filmed last summer and stars Kevin Costner. For more info:

 http://draftdaythemovie.com/story

Are Public Sports Facilities Worth It? Part Two

I'm not sure if anyone can accurately calculate the overall financial impact of having professional sports teams in a community, as the whole thing is quite complicated, but if we lay out some of the benefits versus the negatives, I think we can make a pretty fair assumption. Teams bring people into communities* for games and other events associated with them, and those people spend money. They buy tickets, pop, beer, hotdogs, programs, and souvenirs at the facilities, plus they may pay to park, if they arrived by car, or they may stay at hotels where they pay for rooms, breakfasts, lunches and dinners, and then they're apt to go shopping, take tours, visit the various sites in the area, etc. Airports and airlines benefit, since teams, as well as press people who cover the visiting teams, fly in and out, and of course, the same with the officials for the games, umpires and referees (these people all stay at hotels, too). All of this is money coming into the community from outside. Then sports teams provide entertainment for the locals, who spend money in their own community on many of the things I've mentioned above, although, naturally, they don't have to book hotel rooms or travel all that far to attend games, but that keeps the money in the community, and it helps public transportation for those who use it to get to games.** I'm not sure what the general criteria is today, but when I was much younger, a team's drawing area was generally seen as a 150 mile radius of its home, although obviously that definition is not always possible due to geography. Having sports teams also helps local promoters "sell" the community to outsiders as a good place to visit, or to live in, if relocation is under consideration.

Communities take in money from rent on the facilities,*** and they often collect parking fees from city owned lots or garages. Then there are employees, not only at the facilities, like ticket takers, ushers, and security personnel, but at all of the supporting businesses, like the suppliers of hotdogs, popcorn and beer, and even at the places where the tickets and programs are printed. Further still, there are the outside businesses that benefit, like hotels, restaurants, shops, and bars. The money generated by all of this brings in tax revenue from sales taxes, bed taxes (common for hotels), and beverage taxes, plus income taxes, if the community has such. In the latter case, the community benefits from a local income tax by also getting the tax on the large salaries of the players and owners  Teams that consistently draw well can help to provide communities with revenues to maintain, or perhaps even expand or improve, services.  

Lastly, while I think salaries and the whole pro-sports program has gotten out of hand, I've also said here in previous articles that I realize we all need a certain amount of entertainment in our lives, which is often supplied by professional sports. Trust me, I get it.

Now, what about the other side? Well naturally it all depends upon how teams draw and help contribute to all of those things I mentioned above (and probably some I forgot to include). If a team struggles at the gate, the more seasons they struggle, the greater the decline in the benefits they provide, especially since the expenses incurred tend to stay about the same; that is, the facilities have to be maintained, debts on facilities have to be paid, police have to direct traffic, ushers and security personnel (I would guess usually police, in most communities) have to be present for games. Without being able to really calculate an accurate figure on how teams help communities, it is also not entirely possible to say if, or at what point, they hurt communities, although in some cases where teams lose community support, and attendance plummets, that determination may not be able to be given an exact number, but it is still an obvious negative.  

So what about now? As earlier, I'll use Cleveland as something of an example, although I realize not every community has the same situation in every case. As I noted in "Part One," here in Cleveland the issue of putting a retractable roof on the football stadium was raised recently. It was a big story for a couple of days, although it has subsided somewhat now, and "apparently" there was no concerted effort to push such a proposal, although we'll have to see how all of this plays out in the coming weeks and months, now that the Browns have a new owner. Let's just say for the sake of argument, the Browns make it known they want a retractable roof on the stadium. The new owner has hired architects and engineers to look at the facility, but for a number of reasons, according to his statements. To put a dome on a stadium that large, a stadium that wasn't built to accommodate such a dome, as far as I know, would, I have to believe, be a major undertaking with a huge price tag. The other thing to consider is this; the upkeep of the football stadium, the ballpark and the basketball arena all were funded by a special tax on alcohol and tobacco, and the authority for that tax expires in a couple of years. Voters would have to approve a renewal of the tax, and that's "IF" the State of Ohio even permits such a tax again, as, according to "Crain's Cleveland Business" earlier this year, lobbyists for both the alcoholic beverage and tobacco industries were able to get language into a state law a few years ago that forbids such taxes.That could prove to be very interesting, especially regarding alcohol, because the beverage industry could end up cutting its own throat by hurting the teams that sell their products, as alcoholic beverages and sports have a close relationship.

Just another item you might think worthy of discussion. Pro spots teams and communities generally have had a private-public partnership, of sorts, as communities provide the publicly funded facilities. With all the talk of "free markets," should teams have to provide their own facilities? In the past I have heard the argument, and I can't say exactly from which owner or owners, that if team owners had to build their own facilities, they would have to charge too much. Hm, I thought free markets always worked and government "distorted" the markets. We always hate things given to others, until we want something, then we find ways to say, "Well... I didn't mean when it applies to me." We must also remember, the teams pay rent, so the facilities aren't free for them to use, but by using public facilities, the owners don't have to lay out large investments to have such facilities built. And remember too, the communities have built these facilities to make money in a variety of ways, many of which I recounted above, so these are really business deals, as professional sports is really nothing like a game, in spite of apologists who say fans get too emotional, "because it's just a game." BALONEY! Anything with such huge sums of money involved is NOT a game. Anyway, communities choose to pact with professional sports franchises, some of the owners of which are ruthless devils, and when you pact with the devil, sometimes you get burned. Yes, when owners have burned certain communities by moving teams to other locations, the public and the politicians all scream bloody murder, but you can't have it both ways, although in more recent times communities have tried to protect themselves with clauses in leases saying teams can only leave town after conditions x,y, and z are met, or with signed declarations by owners to never move the team.**** 

In the end, sports teams DO help communities overall, in my opinion. Whether they need fancy ballparks and stadiums, I'm not so sure, but don't look for it to change anytime soon. Too many people are hooked on pro sports, and both the owners and players know it. Until the public stays away in droves, you'll keep hearing about new or improved facilities you'll help pay for. If you don't want to pay, the moving van will probably pull up to load the team's equipment for transport to a place where the people will pay.
 
* I'm using "community" instead of just "city." A hundred years ago, most people in Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Boston, Detroit, Chicago, etc actually lived IN the cities, with areas outside these cities often being sparsely populated countryside. Gradually this changed as suburban areas began to develop, which really took off after World War Two, and today, many of the suburbs are really connected to the cities in an urban community, so, in my opinion, it is far more appropriate to use the term "community."

** New York naturally has the subway system, and other communities have mass transit of some type. Here in Cleveland, you can drive to a transit parking lot, park for free, get on the train (called "the Rapid"), or a bus, and go downtown, where you can then use a walkway to go right over to see an Indians' or Cavaliers' game; or if you are going to a Browns' game, you change to another train which takes you right to the stadium. Needless to say, many people here use the public transit system this way. Since I went over some history in "Part One," I should note that, before the train ran right to the stadium, you could take a train or bus and get off downtown, where there were shuttle buses waiting to take you the few blocks to old Municipal Stadium for Browns' games, and Indians' games with large advance ticket sales. It was like 25 or 50 cents, but that was in the 1980s.

*** The rent and certain fees may go to a specific local entity that manages the facilities, rather than going directly into community coffers, and the money is then used for upkeep and retirement of debt on the facilities.

**** If I remember correctly, in order to get final approval for his move of the Browns to Baltimore, Art Modell had to buy out the remaining years of his lease in Cleveland, which cost him something like 10-12 million. 

WORD HISTORY:
Ground-This is the noun as in, "the soil of the earth." It goes back to Indo European "ghrendh," which meant, "to rub, to rub together to break down a substance." There are no apparent relatives outside of Germanic with a similar meaning as in Germanic. Old Germanic had "grunduz," which had the notion of "bottom, deep area, foundation;" from the idea of "particles that form a basis or foundation." This gave Old English (Anglo-Saxon) "grund," which meant "base, bottom, surface of the earth." The word later took on the extended meaning "basis, reason." Common in the other Germanic languages: German and Low German have "Grund" (ground, reason), West Frisian has "grun" (land, ground), Dutch has "grond" (soil, ground, base), Danish has "grund(en)" (foundation, base, site), Norwegian has "grunn," and Swedish has "grund" (reason, foundation). I could not find a form in Icelandic, where the word seems to have been replaced by other terms, although it could be archaic.

Are Public Sports Facilities Worth It? Part One

Here is the question: Should taxpayers fund sports venues for super wealthy owners and athletes?

This will mix some history with the above question, since history and community commitments to professional sports teams are central to how many people answer that question. I haven't really spent any time researching this, so most is from memory, although the recent death of Art Modell has brought the issue of private sports franchises operating in publicly funded facilities back into view, at least to some people, and the recent news coverage has refreshed my memory somewhat. Modell's sweetheart deal to move a solid franchise like the Cleveland Browns to Baltimore for the 1996 season showed that no franchise in any sport was really safe, and that ruthless owners could exploit the fear of a community losing its team to gain new or extensively updated facilities, with the cost largely, or entirely, borne by taxpayers. Generally, as professional sports developed (more so baseball, at first), well over a hundred years ago, cities had facilities for the local team or teams to play their games. Generally these facilities were small by many of today's standards, although Fenway Park in Boston retains much of the odd configuration of  some of the old ballparks,* but of course, even there they added more seats in recent times, and there has been a trend to build new ballparks more like the the intimate facilities of the earlier 20th Century.

Here in Cleveland, the Cleveland Indians played at "League Park" on the near East Side (E. 66th Street). Famous Cleveland players like pitchers Cy Young and Bob Feller and outfielder Tris Speaker played many a game there, as well as non Cleveland players like Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Ted Williams and Joe DiMaggio. Clevelanders approved funding for a new city owned multipurpose stadium in the late 1920s, the result being a new 80,000 seat colossus right off of Lake Erie in downtown Cleveland.** The Indians played their first game there in 1932 in front of over 80,000 fans. Initially Cleveland Municipal Stadium did not have a fence, but the huge distance to most parts of the seats for a home run was prohibitive (fans like to see home runs), and a temporary fence was put up for baseball games (it could be taken down for football or other activities, and then reinstalled relatively quickly).*** The Indians continued to play at League Park, with occasional games moved to Municipal Stadium for big crowds. I believe League Park could only hold something like 25,000 people maximum, and that may well have included any standing room. The Indians permanently moved to Municipal Stadium after World War Two, and in 1948 the team drew an amazing (for those times) 2.6 million fans, a record which stood until more recent times, and that was when teams played 77 home games during the regular season, compared to 81 now (this started in the early 1960s).

Professional football was played at the new stadium in the 1930s, but it really took off in the post World War Two era with the Cleveland Browns, who regularly drew crowds of 80,000. Boxing matches, concerts and other events were also held at Municipal Stadium over the years. I have no idea how much the city of Cleveland charged for rent, but by the 1970s, tight budgets had the city turn the operation of the stadium over to Browns' owner Art Modell for a nominal annual leasing fee to the city (the city retained ownership of the property). Modell set up the "Stadium Corporation," with himself as head and majority owner, to run the aging facility, and he collected rent from the Indians and from the Browns (he was majority owner of the Browns, so he essentially paid rent to himself). He invested in new scoreboards (including smaller auxiliary scoreboards at various locations around the stadium) and he had a system of luxury loges, complete with bar service and televisions, built below the upper deck for corporate and wealthy fans, who paid an annual rent. The arrangement proved to be a good one for Modell, but not for the Indians, as they received none of the rental money. Over time, the Indians argued that with escalating payrolls, they needed all the income they could get to sign or retain quality players. That was years ago, it's far worse now! In the late 1970s, the Indians signed highly touted pitcher Wayne Garland for the sum of like $300,000. That was BIG money in sports back then; now you can't get a shortstop who bats .198 and makes two errors a game for that amount, which tells you how out of hand all of this nonsense is.

The loge rental money became a serious issue between the Indians' owners and Modell, who was their landlord. Since the Indians played 81 home games compared to the Browns 7 regular season games (back then) and one or two preseason games; the Indians were Modell's major tenant, but I don't recall how much they paid in rent or other fees, but I seem to remember they paid a base rent, and then some percentage based upon attendance. By the late 1980s, after much planning and arguing, a grand plan was developed to build a new sports complex on the southern edge of downtown, where the Indians would have a new ballpark and control their own revenue, the NBA Cavaliers would have a new arena, and the Browns would get a new stadium. Modell had been pushing for a dome on the existing stadium, but the plan did not have total community support, nor general support from the Indians, who wanted revenue from the increasingly popular (in other cities) luxury seating; something Modell did not want to share. Modell chose not to participate in the new complex, but to keep the Browns playing in the old stadium. Whether you like or hate Modell, he was NOT a stupid man, but undoubtedly his ego interfered with his judgment, a common problem for egomaniacs, as once a ballpark was open for the Indians, his stadium revenues had to fall.**** Modell's Browns were the kings of the town, but the new owners of the Indians (brothers Richard and David Jacobs) were smart business people. I just have to believe Modell could not bring himself to give up control of the old stadium, where he kept the Indians playing second fiddle to the Browns, and where he kept revenue for himself, and thus from their owners in a sports world gone nuts on big bucks.

So a few years later the Indians moved into their new ballpark, selling out the place for every game for several years. Meanwhile, the very first year the Indians were gone from old Municipal Stadium, Modell felt the pinch of his bad decision, as his revenue at the old stadium plummeted. Having missed an opportunity for a brand new stadium, still in a lease at the old stadium, ego bruised and undoubtedly envious of the success of the Indians (who were the talk of the town), and now seriously pressed for cash, Modell secretly negotiated with Baltimore and Maryland officials and moved the Browns to Baltimore, where he got a new stadium, revenue streams and public money to operate the franchise! There too he had to eventually take in a partner to supply money, which eventually brought him a Super Bowl win, but Modell's overall ego driven business sense left him in debt again, and the league eventually pressured him to sell the team, which he did.

With the Browns gone, the Cleveland community fought to get a new team with the promise of building a new football stadium, which took place at the same location as the old stadium. In 1999 a new Browns team started play in Cleveland. Now a new owner has just taken over in 2012, and just this last week or so the idea of putting a retractable dome on the football stadium has surfaced. The stadium is owned by the city and some people have wondered how to better utilize the large facility, which seats somewhere around 73,000, and to bring in more revenue. This is a major problem with football stadiums, since NFL teams only play 8 home games (in more recent times) and one or two preseason home games. What the hell do you do the rest of the 355 days? Like any building or home, just being in existence brings wear to such a facility, which then require repairs and updates, which all cost money. There has been criticism at times for placing the new stadium on the site of the old facility, right on the lakefront, where winds come whipping down from Canada, at times picking up moisture from Lake Erie and depositing it on land as either rain or snow. I'm not an architect or an engineer, but the critics have argued that this naturally takes a toll on the structure, which certainly makes sense, but whether having the football facility on the southern edge of downtown, along with the other facilities, would be all that better, is beyond me. Critics have also argued that the land on the lakefront could then have been better utilized for attractions to compliment the nearby Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and the Great  Lakes Science Center. Just to be clear, Browns Stadium is used for some college and maybe even some high school games or events, but not nearly anywhere enough to take a real chunk out of the 355 days when it is not used by the Browns, who don't even train there, but rather use a facility in the southwest part of town, in Berea, not far from Cleveland Hopkins International Airport.   

Naturally every community's history with sports franchises varies, but this gives you an idea of what can go on. It should be noted that Baltimore suffered the loss of their NFL team, the Colts, in 1984. At that time Modell and many other owners spoke against such a move, as the Colt's owner, Robert Irsay, moved the team to Indianapolis without any announcement and in the middle of the night. In a show of extreme disconnect, many Baltimore fans cheered the arrival of the Browns and Modell, quickly forgetting their anger over the loss of the Colts, although many commentators and other fans noted their unease over those who cried and cursed the move of the Colts, but then wildly cheered the arrival of another community's team. In "Part Two" I'll try to put an answer to the initial question.    

* "Ballpark" was a common term in the past; and in fact, my father always used that term, never "stadium." The facilities themselves were usually called either "park" or "field," and some of the facilities were (some still are): League Park (Cleveland), Crosley Field (Cincinnati), Wrigley Field (Chicago-for the Cubs), Comiskey Park (Chicago-for the White Sox), Fenway Park (Boston, for the Red Sox), Braves Field (Boston-the Braves were originally in Boston), and Forbes Field (Pittsburgh), to name a few, but there were exceptions, notably Yankee Stadium in New York, but then New York also had Ebbets Field for the then Brooklyn Dodgers and the Polo Grounds for the then New York Giants (baseball, of course), and the New York Mets played there for the first couple of years of their existence in the early 1960s.

** Some city leaders hoped the new stadium would give Cleveland a shot at landing a future summer Olympics, and Municipal Stadium came complete with a great running track and plenty of room for other field events. The "official" number of seats for baseball varied over the years as adjustments were made, but when important games were held, the 80,000 figure was generally used, although that usually included standing room behind the fence. The biggest adjustment for baseball was for seating in the center field bleachers, where eventually seats in a number of sections were not for sale, and the seats were painted dark blue to provide a good background for batters. (Note: Similar happened in other cities too, as batters had complained about losing sight of the ball in white shirts worn by fans seated in the bleachers.) The temporary "baseball" fence that was put up around much of the outfield was a simple chain link type, and later (maybe mid to late 1960s, I just forget), blue padding was added to protect outfielders who crashed into the fence when chasing a fly ball. About 1980, I was at a game when the Yankees were in town, and, I guess by agreement with the Yankees (and maybe the American League?), attendants  took some of the padding down from the fence in right center field for standing room, and some fans were permitted to sit in the usually closed for baseball center field bleachers (they were not seated in direct center, but to the sides), as most or all of the regular seats had been sold.

*** The bleachers in dead center field were 480 feet from home plate, but then there was a fairly high wall, so a batter had to hit a ball over 500 feet to reach into that area of the bleachers, something that was never done in the more than 60 years of its existence. At some point (I believe in the late 1970s?), extra bleacher seats were erected below that wall for Cleveland Browns' games, but no one ever hit a ball on the fly into those seats either.

**** While I noted Modell wasn't stupid, his business judgment has oft been called into question, and he had frequent money problems, even with large cash infusions from other sources, until he left football. I use the term "egomaniac" for Modell, because winning a championship at ANY cost, no matter whose money or emotions were spent, became his life's goal, and that quest cost many people. That's what can happen when some people see themselves as the center of the universe and seem to say, "I'm important! I'm more important that you or anyone else." To me, they deserve a penalty flag.  

WORD HISTORY:
Stadium-This word traces back to the Indo European root "sta," which meant "stand." This gave its Greek offspring "stadios," which meant "something fixed in place." This then gave Greek "stadion," which meant "a running track of fixed size." Latin borrowed the word from Greek as "stadium," with the meaning "measured running track." English borrowed the word from Latin in the 1500s (some believe earlier), with the meaning "racetrack." When seating was added around such a track, the entire complex took on the meaning "stadium," which later often came to be applied to sports venues in general.  

What We Do In Life Matters

SPECIAL NOTE: I wrote this in September 2012. Since that time, LeBron James returned to his home area to play for the Cleveland Cavaliers. The team won a championship in 2016, but more importantly, BY FAR, LeBron James learned from his mistake when he left town and he doubled down on his efforts to help this community, especially to help the children of this community. As I wrote back when I did this article in 2012, James continued to help the kids of this area when he played in Miami. LeBron James has money and fame, and he is often touted as the "greatest basketball player on the planet," but he has proven himself to be a far greater human being than a basketball player. This note added September 25, 2018


If you follow things here regularly, you know I recently did two articles with the theme, "Life Has Consequences." This article really ties in with that theme too, but not by design. As most of you are aware, Art Modell, the former owner of the Cleveland Browns, died this week at age 87. Modell came to Cleveland in 1961 when he purchased the Browns, a team which had won numerous national championships prior to his arrival. After Modell purchased the Browns, they won one national championship, in 1964. Regardless of the lack of championships, the franchise was one of America's best known and loved, regularly drawing crowds to fill, or nearly fill, the 80,000 seats of old Cleveland Municipal Stadium, even in years when the team struggled on the field. Modell became a solid part of the community and one of the top owners in the NFL. I'm not necessarily writing this to praise him or to condemn him to hell, as both sentiments have been expressed in so many comments by others since his death a few days ago. Nor will this be a recounting of Modell's life or of his complex business dealings here in Cleveland. No, I just want to point out a few things about how a much respected man made a choice in a moment of both hurt feelings and financial desperation that haunted him for the rest of his life, and now even in death. The powerful can have a huge impact on the lives of the many, even when it's only about football, just a game that has become big business, or perhaps more appropriately, BIG business. To be quite honest, the powerful love the accolades and the money it brings them, but some, perhaps too many in this day and age of excess, forget that such power also brings responsibility.

For those unaware, Art Modell made a decision in the fall of 1995 to move the Cleveland Browns to Baltimore for the next season. The initial process was done secretly and quickly. When the move became public, it devastated the huge fan base of devoted Browns fans, not only in Cleveland, but across the country. The reaction in Cleveland was one of outrage, and that is putting it mildly. Interestingly the town had been riding a bit of a high, as the Cleveland Indians had just appeared in a World Series for the first time in over 40 years, losing however, in six games, but they made it to the Series, and the team looked to be a continuing contender. At work, a guy (a contractor) was talking with a lady about the World Series, and she told him that she really wasn't much of a baseball fan, but she noted "how serious the players looked." Now, old Randy, once a diehard baseball fan, disgusted by how money had taken over all professional sports, couldn't help himself, and he cynically interjected, "Sure they're serious. They're wondering how they're going to spend all of that money. It's all about money now, it's not a game." The guy was just furious with me, but I wasn't mad, because I saw myself in him, until I parted ways with professional sports just a few years before. About a week later, Modell announced that the Browns were moving and a few days later, I saw the "angry guy" again. This time, he said, "You were right." I wasn't quite sure what he meant, but then he mentioned the above incident and then Modell's announcement, and he said, "It IS all about money." Nothing like reality to smack you upside the head and dispel your idealism. When you're growing up, you gradually come to realize there's no Santa Claus, but the reality of the Browns leaving Cleveland came in one gigantic smack, with no preparation.

Dick Feagler was a long time columnist in the local newspapers, mainly the Cleveland Press, which ceased operations in 1982, and the (Cleveland) Plain Dealer, where he retired as a columnist about three years ago. He was also a reporter and commentator on local television news. He's had a discussion program on Cleveland PBS station WVIZ for many years, a show I very much enjoy. Friday evening, September 7, part of the show was about Modell's death and legacy. A Cleveland businessman and friend of Modell's was one of the participants. His name is unimportant, but he was obviously in Modell's corner (on the personal side), although he admitted Modell should have negotiated more before making any decision to leave Cleveland. The pro and con arguments about Modell are never ending, but one thing he said caught my attention. He mentioned that the reaction in Cleveland of intense hatred for Modell shocked him, which prompted Feagler, in an effort to say how devoted the fans were, to interject something to the effect, "Have you ever seen those fans in the "Dog Pound?"* The man went on to tell how Modell could never attend a game here again after his announcement for fear for his very life. Such decisions have consequences; enduring consequences.

Now, I've seen the man before, I believe different times on Feagler's show, and I want all to know, I don't know him. He might be the salt of the earth, a great guy, charitable and caring, but it was the underlying attitude that got me, fairly or unfairly. What he really seemed to be saying in my opinion was, "Business people can do ANYTHING and you just have to take it. You shouldn't hate us, no matter what." He and the other panelists went on to mention numerous things Modell did for the community, and they're all true. As I noted above, Modell became a solid member of the Cleveland community after he came here in the early 1960s, but then in just a matter of days, he wiped away ANY good he had done by abandoning this community and slinking away with one of its most cherished assets. Yes, a few years later a new Browns' team was formed, but it's never really been the same here.** Much the same astonishment seems to have inflicted LeBron James. He did much to help this community (and still does to some extent), but he too made a terrible self-centered decision which also devastated the community,*** only to be perplexed by the hostility shown to him thereafter. With both Modell and James it's like, "Gee, I just don't understand how people can hate me." And then the comments by supporters and apologists who say, "It's only a game." There's a serious disconnect folks. When the hatred comes, NOW it's only a game. They didn't act like it was "only a game" when they were raking it in and extracting every ounce of emotion from devoted fans.

My favorite book is John Steinbeck's "East of Eden." **** In Chapter 34, Steinbeck boils life down in his shortest chapter of the book. He talks about the death of a man, unnamed, but who is unmistakably John D. Rockefeller, the wealthiest man of his time. Rockefeller lived much of his life here in Cleveland, and then his death, as indeed he is buried here. Steinbeck talks about how Rockefeller's ruthless desire for wealth left him a hated man,***** even after he later gave huge sums to various causes, "to try to buy back the love he had forfeited." Steinbeck even thinks Rockefeller's good deeds may have outweighed the bad, but still, when Rockefeller died, many an American said, "Thank God that son of a bitch is dead." Like it or not, fairly or unfairly, that same sentiment has undoubtedly crossed many a mind here in Ohio in the last few days.

* For those unaware, the "Dog Pound" is the bleacher area where some of the most "rabid" Browns' fans sit for every Browns' home game; rain, sunshine, snow, blizzards, zero temperatures, freezing rain, 50 mile an hour winds, you just name it. They wear ferocious masks and bark and growl like dogs and my suggestion is, if you choose to sit there, hope and pray they've all had their rabies shots, and be sure to take along a full box of  "Meaty Bone" dog biscuits, just to keep them happy."Rrrrrrruf!"

** A few years ago I was waiting for a pizza at a local pizza shop when a man in a Browns' jersey came in. I took a moment to chat with him about the team and what had happened when Modell left town. He said he was still a devoted fan, but that it just wasn't the same, the real Browns had left town. I've heard it from others, too, although I suspect a truly competitive team would change some of the doom and gloom.

*** LeBron James was the leading player on the Cleveland Cavaliers of the National Basketball Association, until he chose to go to Miami to play with two other superstars in order to win a championship. To further humiliate the community, although I'm sure that wasn't the intention, the whole thing was done on a nationally televised broadcast with the expressed purpose of revealing "the decision," as he termed it. Talk about an ego run amok! At least Modell hid things, perhaps out of some "conscience," but LeBron James rubbed everyone's nose in it, PUBLICLY. 

**** Quotes here are from "The Works of John Steinbeck," Longmeadow Press, 1985. ISBN: 0-681-31923-2

***** Bob Hope, who grew up in Cleveland, often told the story of how, as a kid, he sold newspapers on an East Side corner, and how John D. Rockefeller would pull up in his chauffeur driven car and get a paper from him. Hope said Rockefeller would give him a nickle for the paper, which I believe cost three cents way back then, and he wanted his two cents change. Hope laughed about it, because Rockefeller's wealth was equivalent to tens of billions of dollars when Hope told the story later in his life.   
    
WORD HISTORY:
Dead-This word goes back to Indo European "dheu," which meant "to die," and which produced a participle form "dhautos," which meant "to have died, be dead." This gave its Old Germanic offspring "dauthaz/daudaz," with the same meaning. This produced Old English (Anglo-Saxon) "dead," with the "e" being long, and the "a" short. This later became "ded/deed," before the modern version, generally used as an adjective, but also as a noun, as in, "the dead are buried in the churchyard." Common throughout the other Germanic languages: German has "tot,"^ Low German Saxon has "doot," West Frisian has "dead," Dutch has "dood," Danish has. "død," Swedish has "död," Icelandic has "dauthur," and Norwegian has "død."
 
^ Standard modern German is much based upon Old High German, one of the characteristics of which often, but not always, became a change from a "d" sound to a "t" sound in many instances; thus, "dod" became "tot." The northern Germanic dialects were unaffected by this change and came to be called "Low German," and neither were the dialects that became English affected, as the Angles and many Saxons had already settled in Britain by that time.